• Online Edition
  • Archives
  • About
  • Support The Sheet
  • Contact

The Sheet

  • News
    • Mountain Town News
    • Sports and Outdoors
  • Arts and Life
  • Opinion/Editorial
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Dining

The first judgment

  • by Sheet Staff
  • in News
  • — 31 Mar, 2011

A look back at the original Hot Creek litigation ruling

Back in 2008 The Sheet was the only local news source to closely follow the Hot Creek court proceedings that took place in Bridgeport at the Mono County Courthouse. It was here that the Town of Mammoth Lakes originally lost the $30 million lawsuit that had been filed against it by Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, a.k.a. Hot Creek. Now, three years later, the Town must finally come to terms with the original judgment since both the Court of Appeals and the State’s Supreme Court have denied any changes to the 2008 decision.

To see The Sheet’s original coverage of the court case from 2008, click on the links below.

April 12, 2008

April 19, 2008

Special Edition: April 22, 2008

Share

Topics: mammothNewssheet

— Sheet Staff

This story was written by multiple authors whose names are below the header at the top of the page, or by The Sheet staff.

You may also like...

  • Lahontan to discuss renewal of grazing waiver 6 Jul, 2012
  • Interim MLPD Chief appointed 9 Jun, 2010
  • Letters to the editor 24 Jun, 2011
  • Not so happy trails 1 Jun, 2012
  • Previous story MHS baseball beats Big Pine
  • Next story Horrorscopes
  • Special Publications

  • Recent Posts

    • EINSTEIN REDUX
    • NOBODY BEATS THE BLIZZ
    • FAKE IT TILL YOU MAKE IT
    • CROCETTI ON THE ATTACK?!
    • SCHOOL-SHOOTER PROTOCOL
  • Special Publications

  • News
    • Mountain Town News
    • Sports and Outdoors
  • Arts and Life
  • Opinion/Editorial
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Dining

© 2022 THE SHEET. DEVELOPED BY PENDERWORTH.