More on the budget from Rob Clark
Dear Editor:
We continue to read about the financial problems in cities and other levels of government throughout the Country. Many people have assumed that the Town of Mammoth Lakes must have the same problems. I recently received a copy of a random survey conducted by a budget analyst in Palo Alto. It shows that the Mammoth Lakes Town Council was one of the few that made the hard decisions necessary to avoid deficits.
City Projected Deficit FY 2009-10 Projected Deficit 2010-11
Town of Paradise 164,000 651,000
Pinole 227,000 470,000
Cotati 370,000 320,000
Watsonville 372,000 1,900,000
Davis 800,000 500,000
Oakdale 820,000 1,200,000
La Verne 1,000,000 1,000,000
Lake Forest 1,100,000 unknown
Healdsburg 1,280,000 unknown
Milpitas 1,300,000 unknown
Union City 1,500,000 2,000,000
Fountain Valley 1,700,000 2,500,000
Palo Alto 1,833,000 6,351,000
Campbell 2,000,000 unknown
Dana Point 3,100,000 2,300,000
Redwood 3,600,000 5,900,000
Victorville 4,300,000 unknown
Oceanside 4,400,000 8,000,000
Long Beach 6,000,000 11,000,000
Santa Monica 7,700,000 6,900,000
Santa Rosa 10,000,000 10,000,000
Oakland 15,260,000 32,720,000
Diamond Bar has no deficit no projected deficit
La Habra Heights has no deficit no projected deficit
Danville has no deficit no projected deficit
Mammoth Lakes has no deficit no projected deficit
Throughout the course of the recession the Town Council has continuously monitored receipts and taken action immediately to maintain a balanced budget. Last year the Town had a small surplus of $90,000. So far this year revenues are over $250,000 ahead of budget. The Town has over $8 million cash in the bank. As with all other cities, next year is predicted to be a tight year, and the Town Council will need to continue making hard choices to keep its budget balanced.
Sincerely,
Rob Clark,
Town Manager




