• Online Edition
  • Archives
  • About
  • Support The Sheet
  • Contact

The Sheet

  • News
    • Mountain Town News
    • Sports and Outdoors
  • Arts and Life
  • Opinion/Editorial
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Dining

Letters to the Editor

  • by Sheet Staff
  • in Letters to the Editor
  • — 22 Jun, 2012

Town Folly, Redux

To the Editor: 

On Wednesday night, the Town Council, in its typical fashion, self congratulated itself, its staff, and its airport consultant for a job well done in preparing a new proposed Airport Layout Plan.

Council members  then unanimously approved the plan for submission to FAA without a single question for staff. This despite a long list of unaddressed comments I sent them ahead of the meeting.

In the brief staff presentation that introduced the agenda item, it was stated, with specific  reference to my written comments to the Council, that they were “previously received and reviewed and incorporated as appropriate.”

Here is one of my comments:  if you are going to propose Airbus A319 service to the airport, you have to propose future widening of the runway to 150 feet.  On the advice of its airport consultant, staff chose not to either delete the A319 or propose widening the runway. This despite written comments from the FAA on the earlier draft that the Town couldn’t have it both ways.

Here is another of my comments:  that the Town proposes to extend the runway to the west atop a to-be-built 14’ hill. The hill would cover about  50 acres and require hundreds of thousands of cubic yards of compacted fill. It would also require that many of the west hangars––to avoid an avalanche of dirt––would need to be either elevated 15’ or else relocated hundreds of feet to the north.

Don’t get me wrong: there is nothing to stop the Town from making such a proposal to the FAA, and on Wednesday night that is what they voted to do. My objection is that there is no disclosure in the proposed Airport Layout Plan of the hill, the hangar problem, or the true cost of such a massive construction project. The document only shows the proposed runway elevation, and, on a separate sheet, the elevation of grade of the west hangars (20 feet lower than the top of the proposed runway “summit”).

The Town’s “well respected” airport consultant (quoting Councilman Eastman) is the SAME airport consultant, working for real estate developer Terry Ballas back in 1999, who prepared  the applications submitted to the FAA for siting the hangars “in harm’s way” of any future airport expansion plans. (It left more room for a hotel complex, and less room for an airport.) Is it any wonder that he doesn’t disclose the need to move the hangars to extend the runway?

Absent a few hundred million dollars in funds (makes the judgement of $43M look like spare change), Mammoth Lake’s airport will never be able to safely accommodate large aircraft. And let’s not argue about my interjection of safety into this discussion:  the Town makes no pretense of proposing upgrades to meet FAA airport safety standards for large aircraft –– although I am hopeful that this approach will change, now that Public Works has taken over management of the airport.

The Town Council should have given my comments some credence, and asked  questions of staff, before rubber-stamping the revised draft ALPUN/ALP.

Stephen Kalish
Swall Meadows

Flavin of the month 

Dear Editor:

I have recently heard of the four climbers that tragically died on Mt. McKinley in Alaska. I have not heard of any movement by the park service to close Mt. McKinley.

I again ask why Hot Creek is to remain closed for safety reasons when a much more dangerous federal area remains open?

I state again that the reason for closure is that our local park supervisor is afraid to reverse a prior decision. Typical government inaction.

The reality is that Hot Creek would be far down the list of dangerous activities in our forest. Hunting,  mountain climbing, cutting wood with a chainsaw, encounters with bears/mountain lions and other hazards of the outdoors are much more of a safety  risk.

I again ask Inyo Forest District Ranger Regelbrugge to open Hot Creek to the public based on current conditions.

Sean Flavin
Mammoth Lakes 

 

The following letters were written to Yosemite National Park Fire Education and Information Manager Gary Wuchner upon receipt of his announcement of a controlled burn (the “Hodgdon” burn) which was conducted this past week.

Bad decision

Dear Mr. Wuchner:

I’m having an extremely difficult time believing ANYONE (government or private) would start a controlled fire at this time considering the current winds and extremely dry nature of the forest.

If it gets away from you, Yosemite and the surrounding area will have a HUGE problem, including significant legal challenges.

I understand and accept the need for controlled fires, but I’m blown away that anyone would consider starting one right now. I spent the morning compiling my “Evacuation List.”

With huge concerns,
Lisa Isaacs

 

Dear Mr. Wuchner,

Mammoth residents are on pins and needles with this unusually hot weather and high winds worrying that a campfire won’t be fully extinguished or an off-roading OHV will spark some pine needles and there we’ll be, hoping against hope that we can evacuate in time.

Now the Yosemite National Park – Hodgdon Prescribed Fire! Since when is hot and windy summer weather in a drought year a good time for a controlled burn?  Please rethink this decision. The risk is too great.

Elizabeth Tenney
Mammoth Lakes


Share

Topics: mammothNewssheet

— Sheet Staff

This story was written by multiple authors whose names are below the header at the top of the page, or by The Sheet staff.

You may also like...

  • Mammoth-Yosemite Airport: A tragedy in more than one act 18 Feb, 2012
  • Letters to the editor 5 Aug, 2011
  • Photo highlights from last weekend’s U.S. Snowboarding Grand Prix 10 Mar, 2011
  • Letters to the Editor 11 Mar, 2011

1 Comment

  1. Rick Poedtke says:
    June 22, 2012 at 10:09 pm

    Mr. Kalish…

    You could give a Rats Ass about safety issues at MYA. You continue to masquerade behind this “Safety” BS line when the truth is that your real intent and agenda is to cease ANY possible expansion and progress at MYA. I know ALL about it… ALL!

    This continued crap you unceasingly present regarding the town needing to meet FAA Safety Rules and Standards is getting way old. The FAA has the ultimate and final say. They gave their blessings to ALL the current implementations that are in place at MYA. Fact! They have also already noted that they will waive many if not all of those existing implementations that could present any minor safety issues in order to go forward with the current expansion plans via MYA ALP. Just as they have for over 129 plus other airports throughout the United States. This recorded fact continues to be presented to you and your rants, over and over. But, you insist on not accepting the reality of it.

    Bottom line Mr. Kalish, you need to cease and desist this very old unceasing negative BS you that you continue to proliferate regarding MYA. Unlike Bill Manning, I have absolutely nothing to lose. I will be reading and watching. I will rebutt with RECORDED FACT’s, each and every one of your future completely BOGUS letters appears. Hell, I may even begin to attend the Town Council and Airport Commission meetings just to see if you are present. If you are present, I will make a point to re-address and present ALL the current and past recorded facts form the FAA, have it entered into the record, all in order to dispel your continued rants of complete negative nothingness. I will ensure that the people start to see, understand and realize who and what your true intent is. Just as I did with my recent letter here at The Sheet, rebutting Doug Kriese’s completely bogus and totally untrue rant LTE.

    Rick Poedtke
    ABHC(NAC/NPJ) USN(RET)

    PS: I resigned my position at MYA today.

    Reason: The continued negativity that persists towards the MYA, it’s progress and it’s staff. I can now do battle against the forces that persists this negativity without any negative repercussions to the senior staff left to deal with your continued flat out negative stupidity.

  • Previous story Feel the burn
  • Next story Event ticklers
  • Special Publications

  • Recent Posts

    • EINSTEIN REDUX
    • NOBODY BEATS THE BLIZZ
    • FAKE IT TILL YOU MAKE IT
    • CROCETTI ON THE ATTACK?!
    • SCHOOL-SHOOTER PROTOCOL
  • Special Publications

  • News
    • Mountain Town News
    • Sports and Outdoors
  • Arts and Life
  • Opinion/Editorial
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Dining

© 2022 THE SHEET. DEVELOPED BY PENDERWORTH.