TBID vote draws near

This coming Wednesday, July 3 Mammoth’s Town Council is expected to vote to approve the formation of a local TBID (Tourism Business Improvement District).
The proposed TBID would impose varying fees on restaurant, lodging and retail establishments, as well as a 2% fee on all Mammoth Mountain lift tickets, and is expected to raise approximately $4.7 million annually.
The money would be spent on a massive marketing push administered by Mammoth Lakes Tourism, the Town’s NGO (non-governmental organization) dedicated to marketing and tourism.
Approximately $2 million would be earmarked for commercial airline subsidies.
Until now, these subsidies have largely been paid by Mammoth Mountain.
Mammoth Mountain will contribute 2% of ski and bike lift ticket sales and by itself is expected to pay more than half of the $4.7 million.
As TBIDs are a fairly recent phenomenon, there doesn’t appear to be any academic research out there which analyzes their effectiveness. There is some research on BIDs in general.
Anecdotally, Mammoth Lakes Tourism Executive Director John Urdi specifically pointed to the Napa Valley Tourism Improvement District as a success story, so The Sheet spoke with Clay Gregory, President and CEO of Visit Napa Valley, this week to learn more.
Gregory worked in the wine industry at Jackson Family Wines for five years before joining Visit Napa Valley in July 2009.
At that time, the organization had three employees and an annual budget of approximately $500,000.
Gregory saw that the tourism business in Napa had hit a wall, and also recognized that virtually all his competitors – from Sonoma County to Paso Robles to Mendocino – had a TBID in place.
So Gregory hired Civitas Advisors (the same firm Mammoth is using to establish its TBID) in October 2009, and Napa’s TBID went into effect in July 2010.
The TBID, which levied a 2% fee on transient room rentals, increased Napa’s marketing budget by about 750%.
Between 2009 and 2012, here’s what happened.
Lodging properties in Napa Valley saw a 45.8% increase in revenue, from $190.9 million to $278.4 million.
In 2008, just as the recession came crashing down, revenue was approximately $223 million.
The City of Napa, one of the five key municipalities within Napa County, saw 20% year-over-year growth in Transient Occupancy Tax (T.O.T.) from 2010-2011, and another 16% increase for the 2011-2012 fiscal year (ending June 30, 2012).
For FY 2012-2013, the City is projecting another double digit, year-over-year increase in T.O.T.
In the City of Napa, T.O.T. revenue accounts for approximately 20% of all General Fund revenue, not 60% like Mammoth.
Gregory now has 19 employees and an annual budget in excess of $5 million.
He also wants more.
“We’re not seeing a limit yet,” he said, in terms of growth, noting Napa still has plenty of extra capacity for weekdays and off-season (November through April). And the next logical step, he believed, was to extend the BID to restaurants and retail.
According to the most recent census, Napa County has a population of roughly 138,000. According to a 2012 Economic Impact Report prepared by Destination Analysts out of San Francisco, Napa had 2.94 million unique visitors in 2012 and 4.9 million visitor days. 67% of its visitors are day visitors.
The report states, however, that 75% of total visitor spending comes from overnight lodging guests.
A Contrarian View
While the above are compelling numbers, it may be helpful to put them in context.
Can Napa’s recent success be directly correlated to marketing expenditures, or have there been other contributing factors? Such as the zooming popularity of the wine industry.
According to the Demeter Group’s 2012 Wine Industry Outlook, “Spending on wine, especially in the luxury segment ($15/bottle and above) drove a total increase in dollar and unit sales of approximately 6% (year over year).
Luxury sales grew 12.9% in 2010 and 16.5% in 2011.
And that luxury market is exactly where Napa lives. According to the www.countyofnapa.org website,”Napa produces only 4% of California’s wine by volume. But as the largest producer of high-end wines, delivers almost 27% of the sales value of the state’s wine.”
As Danny Brager, V.P. of the Beverage Alcohol practice at Nielsen told the wine institute: “Retailers recognize that wine is a large and growing category, even in economically challenging times, and tends to attract upper income consumers.”
Did the wine drive the marketing, or did the marketing drive the wine?
If business is booming, does anyone really care?
Is it legitimate to make an apples-to-apples comparison between Napa (wine) and Mammoth (skiing)?
Finally, is it fair?
According to an academic paper by Lorlene Hoyt and Devika Gopal-Agge on the “Business Improvement District Model: A Balanced Review of Contemporary Debates,” the authors write “Researchers have criticized the organizational structure of BIDs where Boards have inequitable representation of residents and the less privileged class and the legally enabled provision of weighted voting that devolves larger property owners more authority. Critics argue that such practices are not democratic as they serve the interests of and concentrate power with the privileged classes …”
Dartmouth College Professor of Economics Bruce Sacerdote, a Sheet subscriber, had a more direct and simple response: “Seems like the townspeople should get to vote since so many of their goods and services would go up in price!”
If Council votes to approve the TBID formation Wednesday, the TBID would be eligible to go into effect by August 1. So … townwide sale in July! Everything discounted at least 1%!
Good News For Speeders
The Justice Court in Beatty, Nevada, on the border with Inyo County, will now allow California motorists receiving a ticket; to attend a California DMV approved classroom traffic school.
“This is good news for folks in the Eastern Sierra who drive through Beatty on the way to Las Vegas,” says Ken Harrison of the California Traffic School Association. Harrison points out that in most Nevada counties, a California motorist receiving a violation will need to make another time-consuming and costly trip back to Nevada to attend a traffic school. Nevada courts do not allow violators to take on-line courses.
“Nevada needs to recognize the economic contributions of Californians, and do what Arizona, and 18 other states do – automatically advise California’s licensed drivers it is okay to attend a local, DMV approved, classroom traffic school,” said Harrison.
His organization has petitioned the Justice Courts in the other Nye County, NV areas of Tonopah and Pahrump, requesting the judges there follow Beatty’s lead. Unlike California, each court in Nevada is autonomous as far as traffic school policies.
Harrison is owner of the Oceanside-based I’ll Never Speed Again Comedy Traffic Schools. His school is the only classroom course offered in the Eastern Sierras. His next class will be at the Bishop Church of Religious Science, 129 E. Line St. on Saturday, Aug. 10. Pre-registration is required by calling 800.941.2687.
Odds and ends
John Arnold is back! The pharmacist is now back working in Mammoth, at Vons.
Jimmy’s Taverna and the Red Lantern will be closed for the next few weeks according to Sierra Nevada Resort G.M. Brent Truax. The closure was precipitated by the resignation of Red Lantern Chef Justin Rado, who is leaving to take a job in Austin, Texas. Wife Dympna Rado, the chef at Jimmy’s, had been prepared to run both restaurants through the summer before joining her husband, but Truax said she changed her mind and chose to leave early. He is now in the process of recruiting a new chef team.
The official story had been that the restaurants were closed for renovations, but when challenged on it, Truax told the truth.
According to one server, employees were told that they are all being dismissed and will have to reapply for their jobs.
This same employee was disappointed by the sudden turn of events, noting that Jimmy’s was ranked among Mammoth’s top three restaurants on yelp.
Rafters remains open daily.
(Photo: nytimes.com)
I have lived in Sonoma, Glen Ellen, Napa and San Francisco, currently live in LA and have a second home here in Mammoth. I can tell you right now there is no comparison between Mammoth and Napa. Napa has more than 10 times the population, has a year round major industry (though it’s not the only one) and it is only about 45 minutes drive from THREE international airports, besides the municipal airports in Sonoma, Napa and elsewhere. The proposed TBID is RIDICULOUS!!! Businesses in Mammoth have a hard enough time staying open without being taxed to death. I went and took a look at what Sonoma has done, given it is much more comparable population-wise to Mammoth.
Compare the Mammoth budget with Sonoma:
http://www.sonomavalley4biz.com/sonoma-valley-economic-profile.html
http://edb.sonoma-county.org/documents/city_reports/sonoma_2012.pdf
http://www.sonomacity.org/uploads/Financial/2012_Annual_Financial_Report.pdf
http://www.sonomacity.org/uploads/Financial/FY%202012-13%20Adopted%20Budget.pdf
You can see right away Sonoma has its act together. Mammoth’s problems aren’t solved by more taxation. The people running this town are incompetent. Why hasn’t the city attorney who failed to insert a contingency clause regarding FAA approval of that stupid airport deal been sued for malpractice? Whoever is currently in charge of promoting tourism is a huge failure. This town has so much more to offer than just skiing, yet that has always been the focus. This week’s 4th of July festivities are one example. Nowhere could I find an actual schedule of
events and where exactly they would be taking place. I found out that Crowley charges a ridiculous $25 to park and watch the fireworks. I was told “fireworks are expensive”. For a town that is in bankruptcy, fireworks should be the last thing you spend money on. You can watch them on TV! C’mon, someone needs to be the parent here!
Speaking of expenditures, I noticed an RFP announcement seeking bids on “micro-surfacing” of streets in Mammoth to the tune of $230,000. Excuse me? Have you ever seen the streets in LA? Your streets are perfectly fine. When you are in bankruptcy, you don’t need to spend money on “micro-surfacing” of streets, which is akin to getting dermabrasion or botox when you are on food stamps.
And how about that proposal to re-name a street after McCoy, to the tune of $50,000? Hello, you are in BANKRUPTCY. Why not name a NEW street (in one of the inevitable new developments that you don’t need) after him?
Speaking of developments, this town needs more ill-designed, ugly run of the mill condos,
townhomes and hotels like it needs another hole in its head. My house is in Old Mammoth. Pretty much all my neighbors are all second homeowners, and all of us are hardly ever here. I’m lucky if I get to come up 4-6 times a year because of school schedules and sharing custody and other plans. Yet when I needed to come up to check on my house after major water damage occurred during the week between Christmas and New Year’s, the town was “sold out”. If you want more tourists, you need to have more properties available. Personally, I would take an SFR over a hotel or condo any day, as families prefer larger and more
comfortable and private accommodations than any hotel or condo can offer.
I pay a lot in property tax (bought on the high side) to support a town I don’t get to visit often. I would much rather have my vacant home and the nearby vacant homes rented out than to have the area be a ghost town. For the few year-round neighbors I have, do you really think I or any other absentee homeowner would rent our homes to loud, irresponsible party hounds? That’s what the hotels and condos are for.
On the other hand, I am totally against charging SFR homeowners with TOT. I already pay a lot in property taxes. More than condo owners who share a small portion of property tax and have always enjoyed the ability to rent out their condos. Honestly, I feel the only ones who should be charged the TOT are the hotels, as that is their sole business. If more properties and a variety of properties are made available for rent, you will get more tourists and more
tourist dollars, and rates would be more competitive. The goal after all is more tourism, not more taxes, right?
You have all these fine golf courses. Why don’t you host an invitational competition with top names? You have all these fine lakes. Why not a fishing competition? Why not host a mountain biking competition? Road race? Why not do more to promote the area as a great competitive/Olympic training location for numerous sports?
Finally, I have to say something about how the town treats second homeowners and tourists, who by and large come from So Cal. The highway widening project has made a big difference in the “commute”, but please understand how hard it is to get out of LA on a Friday. It takes about 1-1/2 hours just to go the 20 miles to get out of LA and onto the 14. We all have suffered the past few years with the economy and gas prices. We spend hours driving and lots of gas $ for the big SUVs/4WDs we need to deal with the snow, only to get hassled by local cops who want to ticket us for driving a reasonable 70 mph (OK, maybe 75) on a deserted highway. We pay ridiculous lift ticket prices, deal with the crowds and high prices at the only grocery store, and get lousy food/service at the local restaurants that charge an arm and a leg for so-so food and the worst service ever. We do this, even though we could drive to Big Bear in 1-1/2 hours
and be back home at the beach by 6 pm the same day.
So why do we do it? We could fly to Sacramento or Reno and drive to Tahoe, or fly to Utah or Colorado. Or we could drive to any of those places. Why? Because Mammoth is a small charming town like no other, with lots to do in the “off” season, which happens to be my favorite time to come here. Because the snow, when it comes, is awesome. And because it is a little slice of heaven not that many people know about.
When you talk about tourism and tourism dollars, you are really talking about second homeowners, whether it be an SFR or condo or townhome or timeshare, by and large. If it wasn’t for us, every town between Mojave and Mammoth would be a ghost town. So show some respect for those who support the town via property taxes and as “tourists”. We can’t vote on issues even though we are quite likely the majority as far as ownership of property and revenue.
Those who do live here year round should be attending these city council meetings and voting or insisting on putting to a vote such important issues as the TBID, which will affect them more than anyone. Stop with the apathy, and stop letting a handful of people run y(our) town into the
ground.
/end of rant